Attending is tending toward, the stretch a tender makes across the openness it already is. Ordinary word: orientation. It names the toward held open, the way an act stays directed before any plan, any purpose, any watcher. A thought leans toward what it is about. A life leans toward what calls it. This is directedness itself, and its health is that it can let go of any particular target without losing its direction.
• • • —
The word
Ad-tendere: to tend toward. This is one of the three ways of tending, not the third of them, since the three are not a sequence. English keeps the caring version everywhere: the attendant, the attending physician, attending to a child, a guest, a dying friend. It also keeps the spent version, attention as something paid.
The everyday word straddles two of the three ways, and it is worth saying why rather than letting a reader trip on it. Tend meaning care for is a worn form of attend, so English hears caring inside the toward. In this work’s vocabulary those come apart. The with-ness is called care and lives at intending; the toward is called orientation and lives here. When you attend to a dying friend you are doing both, which is the ordinary case and not a problem.
What it names
Attending names the held toward. It is not a consciousness observing from outside and not a goal already set. It is the act’s own directedness, and it is not a place the act is headed.
One distinction does the real work here. Direction of some kind runs everywhere. A crystal grows one way rather than another, a slope sheds water downhill, a gradient leans. Call that tendency: aimless, unheld, nobody’s. What a tender adds is the holding. Attending is tendency taken up and kept open by a happening that has come to care about where it leans. The crystal needs no awareness for its direction to be real, and it is not thereby attending.
The toward is now. Direction is something an act does, not a place it is going, and this is the guard the page exists for: attending is not the future. A leaning puts nothing later. Read it as futurity and the whole architecture quietly becomes a timeline with three stations on it, which is exactly what this work refuses.
Room, not reach
The positive thing attending contributes is easy to state backwards, so state it forwards. Attending is not the way an act refuses to be pinned down. It is the way an act has room.
A happening is never finally clamped by its own nature. Something in it is not used up by whatever currently fills it, and that unspent room is what lets a next thing be more than a repetition. Letting-loose is a positive operation, as workaday as intensity or answering, and it is neither passive nor a withdrawal. It is the active leaving-open by which a direction stays a direction instead of hardening into a track.
The failure
Attending’s characteristic failure is fixation. The toward seizes one object and cannot release: the grip that mistakes itself for care, the vigilance that has forgotten what it guards. Which reveals the deep thing about attending’s health, that it is as much release as reach. A toward that can let go of any particular target without losing direction, staying directed and warm and unclenched, is attending at its fullest. Devotion that cannot release its object has stopped being devotion and become possession.
Relations
One of three ways of one act. Without extending there is nothing formed to be directed, and without intending the toward has no with to stay open in. The whole is at tending.